Williams, J. (1721). Several arguments, proving, that inoculating the small pox is not contained in the law of physick, either natural or Divine, and therefore unlawful: Together with a reply to two short pieces, one by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and another by an anonymous author, intituled, Sentiments on the small pox inoculated. And also, a short answer to a late letter in the New-England courant. By John Williams (The second edition. [Ten lines of Scripture texts].).
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationWilliams, John. Several Arguments, Proving, That Inoculating the Small Pox Is Not Contained in the Law of Physick, Either Natural or Divine, and Therefore Unlawful: Together with a Reply to Two Short Pieces, One by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and Another by an Anonymous Author, Intituled, Sentiments on the Small Pox Inoculated. And Also, a Short Answer to a Late Letter in the New-England Courant. By John Williams. The second edition. [Ten lines of Scripture texts]. 1721.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationWilliams, John. Several Arguments, Proving, That Inoculating the Small Pox Is Not Contained in the Law of Physick, Either Natural or Divine, and Therefore Unlawful: Together with a Reply to Two Short Pieces, One by the Rev. Dr. Increase Mather, and Another by an Anonymous Author, Intituled, Sentiments on the Small Pox Inoculated. And Also, a Short Answer to a Late Letter in the New-England Courant. By John Williams. The second edition. [Ten lines of Scripture texts]. 1721.