(1715). Some reasons humbly offered, to the consideration of both Houses of Parliament, why the Quakers affirmation should not pass instead of an oath. [publisher not identified].
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationSome Reasons Humbly Offered, to the Consideration of Both Houses of Parliament, Why the Quakers Affirmation Should Not Pass Instead of an Oath. [London]: [publisher not identified], 1715.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationSome Reasons Humbly Offered, to the Consideration of Both Houses of Parliament, Why the Quakers Affirmation Should Not Pass Instead of an Oath. [publisher not identified], 1715.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.