Discourse Ethics : a pragmatic justification for Haberma's moral theory /
"good life," thereby also his bifurcation of Moralitdt and
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified] ;
1998.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Link to OAKTrust copy |
| Summary: | "good life," thereby also his bifurcation of Moralitdt and a philosophically problematic position concerning the Analytic and Continental philosophical traditions. Most of argument for Moralitdt's philosophical and meta- Aristotelian/conu-nunitarian objections and provide an can meet objections to the particular philosophical tradition chapter VI, I will demonstrate how Moralitiit, when applied envisages, drawing in part from his other philosophical works Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification," explication of his moral theory, in chapter V I will then extensive philosophical corpus or else force one to maintain from within which Habermas is working (communicative further analytic explication of the moral theory Habermas Habermas'form of cognitive moral proceduralism has been met have defended the plausibility of Habermas' particular moral his cognitive proceduralism, what he calls Moralitdt. Then, in chapter III, I will show how this form of moral discourse In this thesis, I will first elucidate in chapter II the Moralitdt from Sittlichkeit, or an ethical/existential form of discourse, against general neoHegelian/neo- on ethics. Having defended philosophically this further philosophical independence from Sittlichkeit. Finally, in provide a defense of Habermas' theoretical bifurcation of rationality) and against attempts to derive a workable moral resolution of moral problems. salient features of Habermas' notes for the construction of Since the publication of Jurgen Habermas'essay "Discourse Sittlichkeit. theory and its theoretical independence from theories of the theory from within it. In chapter IV, I will provide a these criticisms, I contend, fail philosophically because they either do not consider critical elements of Habermas' to practical problems, is a tenable moral theory suitable for use by normal, reflective individuals. I hope, therefore, to with a host of criticisms originating from within both the |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Major subject: Philosophy". Vita. |
| Physical Description: | vi, 82 leaves ; 28 cm. Also available online. Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references: pages 77-81. |