The postdiction superiority effect in metacomprehension of text /
16question sets (i.e., a global effect). In addition,
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified] ;
1998.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Link to OAKTrust copy |
| Summary: | 16question sets (i.e., a global effect). In addition, accuracy. An alternative hypothesis based on increased condition when participants made judgments over individual 4- consistently found when judgments were made over the overall feedback h othesis, in which greater postdiction judgment accuracy did not increase over knowledge of the nature of the of text material. Two experiments were conducted in which participants read 4 narrative texts and then answered 16 postdiction judgments of test performance in comparison to prediction judgments that has been shown in metacomprehension question sets (i.e., a local effect), but was not questions per text. Predictions and postdiction judgments self-generated feedback from answering questions allows for sets of 4 questions each. A postdiction superiority effect successive question sets or texts. The findings support a superiority effect the superior accuracy of retrospective or tests was not supported. The present study examined the basis for the postdiction was found in both experiments for the multiple-question set were elicited in either 16-question set blocks or multiple |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Major subject: Psychology". Vita. |
| Physical Description: | vi, 54 leaves : illustrations ; 28 cm. Also available online. Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references: pages 49-50. |