rdf-syntax-grammar
mods:
  schema location: http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
  title info:
    title: Feedlot practices which may affect quality grade in Brahman cross cattle
  name:
    name part: Farr, Zachary Joel
    name part: 1972-
    role:
      role term: creator
  type of resource: text
  genre: bibliography
  origin info:
    place:
      place term: xx
    date issued: 1996
    issuance: monographic
  language:
    language term: eng
  physical description:
    form: print
    form: remote
    extent: vi, 49 leaves ; 28 cm.
  abstract: a difference of 28.67 points in favor of Feedyard A.
  abstract: according to the USDA graders. The Control grader found
  abstract: accounted for 29.8% of the total variation between the
  abstract: Additional fat thickness on the cattle from Feedyard A
  abstract: average quality grade between the test cattle from
  abstract: cattle can be attributed to differences in USDA graders.
  abstract: cattle were sent to two of the feedyards for closer
  abstract: Choice, the test group from Feedyard A graded 28.57
  abstract: different feedyards across the country. Test groups of
  abstract: examination and comparison. In terms of percent USDA
  abstract: Feedyard A and the average set of cattle from the same
  abstract: for 36 h (compared to 24 h for the Feedyard A carcasses)
  abstract: from Feedyard B suggested there was no difference in
  abstract: in the test cattle included: fat added to the ration,
  abstract: in the test cattle were days on feed and total energy
  abstract: intake, both of which favored Feedyard A. Some other
  abstract: of Advisory Committee: Dr. Shawn Ramsey Dr. Steve Wikse
  abstract: Over I 1,000 calves were sent from the same ranch to 13
  abstract: points higher than the test group from Feedyard B
  abstract: possible factors which could have affected quality grade
  abstract: probable feedlot practices which affected quality grade
  abstract: project has a dramatic impact on quality grade. Co-Chairs
  abstract: ranch fed at Feedyard B, If this data is accurate, it
  abstract: space, and treatment just prior to slaughter. Other data
  abstract: suggests that none of the differences studied in this
  abstract: Therefore, none of the difference between the two sets of
  abstract: time of day cattle were shipped to the packing plant, pen
  abstract: two sets, but the carcasses from Feedyard B were chilled
  abstract: which would increase the total variation. The most
  note: by Zachary Joel Farr.
  note: "Major subject: Animal Science".
  note: Vita.
  note: Also available online.
  note: Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.
  note: M.S. Texas A&M University 1996.
  note: Includes bibliographical references: pages 45-48.
  subject:
    topic: Major animal science
  identifier: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-F37
  related item:
    location:
      url: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-F37
  record info:
    record content source: TXA
    record creation date: 970630
    record change date: 20220103134437.0
    record identifier: in00001374862