Electromyographic responses to aerodynamic vs. drop handlebars /
Aerodynamic Handlebars were developed to increase the
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified] ;
1996.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Link to OAKTrust copy |
| Summary: | Aerodynamic Handlebars were developed to increase the and low back. This anecdotal evidence may point out associated with the use of aerodynamic handlebars. These between the two handlebars there was an interaction between competitive cyclists aerodynamic advantage. They place the cyclist in a laid out position with the hands stretched out differences not revealed by metabolic testing. In this study during cycling with both aerodynamic handlebars and drop fatigue and pain in regions such as the upper thigh, buttocks findings are contradicted by anecdotal evidence of specific gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and low back were recorded handlebars as compared to drop handlebars but it is not in handlebars, Although there was no significant interaction in front similar to a down hill skier "tuck" position. rectus femoris and gluteus maximus. These results indicate Research has shown that there are no metabolic changes that there is possibly a differential response to aerodynamic the area we expected. the electromyography of the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, the warm-up and exercise phases of the exercise bouts in the |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Major subject: Kinesiology". Vita. |
| Physical Description: | ix, 72 leaves : illustrations ; 28 cm. Also available online. Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references. |