http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
effect of foot conditions on constrained standing
viii, 76 leaves : illustrations ; 28 cm.
(p<0.0049) and lower back discomfort (p<0.043) with respect
(p<0.009). Subjects preferred Converse@ using a footrail and
(p<0.019) and between Converse@ using a footrail Converse@
consecutive days for four weeks. The foot conditions were
Converse@ AU-Star athletic shoes, Converse@ using a footrail,
Converses with Dr. Scholl& shoe inserts, and Reebokg walking
Eight healthy subjects, four female and four male, stood
lower back and foot discomfort, and Converses alone had the
most. The subjective ranking showed significance between the
physiological effects, subjective rankings, or discomfort
Reebok(& walking shoe and Converse(& All-Star athletic shoes
shoes. The floor surface for all treatments was concrete.
Significance was found for Foot (instep) temperature
This study was conducted to find any differences in
to foot condition. Converse(& using a footrail had the least
using four different foot conditions four hours on four
with respect to foot conditions in constrained standing.
"Major subject: Industrial Engineering".
Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.