A comparison of three deer survey techniques /
= 0.328) or the spotlight surveys (P = 0.719). When
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified] ;
1995.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Link to OAKTrust copy |
| Summary: | = 0.328) or the spotlight surveys (P = 0.719). When an understanding of the abundance of the resource they are conducting transect surveys to obtain data on deer abundance, days the surveys were conducted beyond 3 did not Deer biologists, as with all natural resource managers, need had significantly greater precision (P = 0.002) than morning January 1987 to March 1988. Spotlight surveys resulted in a larger number of deer seen on all 3 sites. Spotlight surveys managing to make sound management decisions. The purpose of National Park Service areas in Texas and New Mexico from night-spotlight surveys were conducted each quarter on 3 or evening surveys. Increasing the number of consecutive significantly improve the precision of the morning surveys (P spotlight surveys conducted for 3 consecutive nights appear surveys. this study was to evaluate the precision of 3 techniques used to assess deer abundance. Morning-drive, evening-drive, and to give greater precision than either morning or evening |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Major subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences". Vita. |
| Physical Description: | vii, 25 leaves : illustrations, maps ; 28 cm. Also available online. Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references. |