R. S. (1663). Jerubbaal justified, or, A Plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton, his Reformation not separation, or, A plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer: Demonstrating T.P (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument : as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme : to which is added a position disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy. [publisher not identified].
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationR. S. Jerubbaal Justified, or, A Plain Rebuke of the High (pretended Humble) Remonstrance and Plea Against Mr. Crofton, His Reformation Not Separation, or, A Plea for Communion with the Church Under Those Corruptions, and by That Disorderly Ministration to Which He Cannot Conform, nor by It Administer: Demonstrating T.P (alias D.) His Grosse Mistakes of Mr. Crofton His Principle and Argument : As Also the Fallacie and Vanity of His Pleaded Necessity for His (confessed) Separation from Publique Assemblies, Which Is Found Insufficient to Acquit Him of Schisme : To Which Is Added a Position Disputing the Lawfulnesse of Ministers Receiving an Imposed Liturgy. London printed: [publisher not identified], 1663.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationR. S. Jerubbaal Justified, or, A Plain Rebuke of the High (pretended Humble) Remonstrance and Plea Against Mr. Crofton, His Reformation Not Separation, or, A Plea for Communion with the Church Under Those Corruptions, and by That Disorderly Ministration to Which He Cannot Conform, nor by It Administer: Demonstrating T.P (alias D.) His Grosse Mistakes of Mr. Crofton His Principle and Argument : As Also the Fallacie and Vanity of His Pleaded Necessity for His (confessed) Separation from Publique Assemblies, Which Is Found Insufficient to Acquit Him of Schisme : To Which Is Added a Position Disputing the Lawfulnesse of Ministers Receiving an Imposed Liturgy. [publisher not identified], 1663.