rdf-syntax-grammar
mods:
  schema location: http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
  title info:
    title: Content and strategies for teaching computer-aided drafting
  name:
    name part: Becker, Kurt Henry
    name part: 1954-
    role:
      role term: creator
  name:
    name part: Baker, Glenn E.
    role:
      role term: degree supervisor.
  name:
    name part: Clark, Donald L.
    role:
      role term: degree committee member.
  name:
    name part: Gutcher, G. Dale
    role:
      role term: degree committee member.
  name:
    name part: Hartman, Roy A.
    role:
      role term: degree committee member.
  name:
    name part: Texas A & M University
    role:
      role term: degree granting institution.
  type of resource: text
  genre: bibliography
  genre: Academic theses
  origin info:
    place:
      place term: xx
    date issued: 1988
    issuance: monographic
  language:
    language term: eng
  physical description:
    form: print
    extent: x, 162 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm
  abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the content and strategies appropriate for computer-aided drafting (CAD) in Technology Education at the secondary level. The Delphi technique was used to identify group consensus by a panel of fifteen education experts in the area of CAD. The panel was nominated by the state coordinators of Technology Education in the five states identified as being the most innovative in CAD practices. The experts generated eight-six statements as a result of the Round One instrument. The statements from Round One were used in the Round Two instrument. In the Round Two instrument, the panel of experts were asked to indicate on a five point Likert-type scale the degree to which they "agreed" or "disagreed" to each statement. The scale ranged from (one) "disagree" to (five) "agree". Also, they were to indicate the time allotment (where applicable). Upon receipt of responses from the Round Two instrument consensus was calculated for each statement - Consensus was interpreted as seventy-five percent of the panelists responses being with one interval on a five point Likert-type scale. The Round Two instrument was modified to become the Round Three instrument. Changes included the elimination of two similar statements, the addition of thirteen new statements, and the modification of one statement to increase clarity. These changes increased the number of statements to ninty-seven. In Round Three, the panelists were asked to compare the modal response from Round Two with their own response for each statement. If a change was needed, they were asked to make the revision. Also, they were asked to rate the additional items offered by the panel during Round Two. Consensus was calculated for each statement in Round Three. The following conclusions were drawn from the finding of the study. Drafting curriculum at the secondary level was in a transition. The content, strategies, and time allotments utilized were wide ranging and reflected differences in …
  note: Typescript (photocopy).
  note: Vita.
  note: "Major subject: Industrial Education."
  note: Ph. D. Texas A & M University 1988
  note: Includes bibliographical references.
  subject:
    geographic code: n-us---
  subject:
    topic: Computer-aided design
    topic: Study and teaching (Secondary)
    geographic: United States
  subject:
    topic: Computer managed instruction
    geographic: United States
  subject:
    topic: Computer-aided design
    topic: Study and teaching (Secondary)
  subject:
    topic: Computer managed instruction
  subject:
    geographic: United States
  subject:
    topic: Major industrial education
  identifier: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl
  identifier: http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login
  related item:
    location:
      url: http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login
  related item:
    location:
      url: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl
  record info:
    record content source: TXA
    record creation date: 890831
    record change date: 20200904152414.0
    record identifier: in00000781245
    language of cataloging:
      language term: eng