Influence of cotton cultivars on boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) behavior and pheromone production /

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chang, Juan Felix Fong, 1947-
Other Authors: Camp, B. J. (degree committee member.), Morgan, P. W. (degree committee member.), Teetes, G. L. (degree committee member.)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: 1986.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link to ProQuest copy
Link to OAKTrust copy
ProQuest, Abstract

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000ctm a2200000Ia 4500
001 in00000017880
005 20220104090828.0
008 880608s1986 xx a bm 000 0 eng d
035 |9 AAB0358AM 
035 |a (OCoLC)18054790 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocm18054790 
040 |a TXA  |b eng  |c TXA  |d OCLCQ  |d UMI  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d TXA 
043 |a n-us-tx 
049 |a TXAM 
099 |a 1986  |a Disser-  |a tation  |a C459 
100 1 |a Chang, Juan Felix Fong,  |d 1947- 
245 1 0 |a Influence of cotton cultivars on boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) behavior and pheromone production / 
264 1 |c 1986. 
300 |a xv, 115 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 29 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a "Major subject: Entomology." 
500 |a Typescript (photocopy). 
500 |a Vita. 
502 |b Ph. D.  |c Texas A & M University  |d 1986 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 93-108). 
520 3 |6 520-00  |a Research was conducted to quantify volatile compounds emanating from the flower buds of seven cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ) cultivars at two planting location, to determine the influence of the volatiles on boll weevil behavior and pheromone production. Volatiles were collected on Porapak Q from the air surrounding the flower buds, and consisted mainly of the monoterpenes: [alpha]-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene, d-limonene and β-ocimene. The concentrations of monoterpenes were significantly greater from the glanded than from the glandless cultivars Differences in monoterpene concentrations were also observed among the glanded cultivars. Behavioral responses of the boil weevil (Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman) to olfactory stimuli were determined in bioassays utilizing a multichambered pedestrian olfactometer. The boll weevil was significantly more attracted to flower buds of 'SP-37' were significantly more attractive than those of 'CAMD-E' when cultivated at Corpus Christi, Texas. The reverse was found for these cultivars grown at College Station, Texas. Males were observed to be more responsive to flower buds than females. Boll weevils were attracted to 0.45 ng of a synthetic formulation of monoterpenes representing the ratio of monoterpenes found in LEBO flower buds. Pheromone production during the first 2 wk of adulthood from boll weevils fed on 'CAMD-E' flower buds increased rapidly from day six to day 13. The ratios of the pheromone components (I) (+)-cis-2-isopropenyl-1-methyl-cyclobutaneethano, (II) cis-3,3-dimethyl- Δ^[1-β]-cyclohexaneethanol, (III) cis-3,3-dimethyl- Δ^[1-[alpha]]-cyclohexaneacetaldehyde, and (IV) trans-3,3-dimethyl- Δ^[1-[alpha]]-cyclohexaneacetaldehyde changed through time. The largest ratio for the aldehyde components (III and IV) compared to the alcohol components (I and II) occurred on day 13, with the ratio of 2.9:2.7:1.0:1.0, for components I to IV respectively. A greater amount of pheromone was produced when boll weevils were fed flower buds of the five glanded than the two glandless cottons. The location where the cultivar was grown affected boll weevil pheromone production for some cultivars. Significantly more pheromone was produced by boll weevils fed on 'SP-37' grown at Corpus Christi than for the other six cultivars... 
650 0 |a Boll weevil  |x Behavior. 
650 0 |a Cotton  |x Diseases and pests  |x Control  |z Texas. 
650 0 |a Pheromones. 
650 4 |a Major entomology. 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Benedict, J. H.,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a Camp, B. J.,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Morgan, P. W.,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Payne, T. L.,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a Teetes, G. L.,  |e degree committee member. 
710 2 |a Texas A & M University,  |e degree granting institution. 
856 4 1 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=752655181&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=2945&RQT=309&VName=PQD  |z Link to ProQuest copy  |t 0 
856 4 1 |u https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-24015  |z Link to OAKTrust copy  |t 0 
856 4 2 |3 ProQuest, Abstract  |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8707397  |t 0 
994 |a C0  |b TXA 
999 f f |s 6711ad98-ee5b-336d-b2ed-84abdef5992d  |i 4ae253cf-c5e8-3160-b7a9-fc70931d5e2c  |t 0 
952 f f |p noncirc  |a Texas A&M University  |b J.J. Pickle Campus  |c High Density Repository  |s HDR  |d Remote Storage  |t 0  |e 1986 Dissertation C459  |h Other scheme  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14839618421 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |s www_evans  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e 1986 Dissertation C459  |h Other scheme 
998 f f |a 1986 Dissertation C459  |t 0  |l Available Online 
998 f f |a 1986 Dissertation C459  |t 0  |l Remote Storage