Aspects of the wintering ecology of northern shovelers on freshwater and saline habitats.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tietje, William Dean
Other Authors: Silvy, Nova J. (degree committee member.), Smeins, Fred E. (degree committee member.)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: 1986.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link to ProQuest copy
Link to OAKTrust copy

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000ctm a2200000Ia 4500
001 in00000013247
005 20220104090800.0
008 880510s1986 xx a bm 000 0 eng d
035 |9 AAA7461AM 
035 |a (OCoLC)17930402 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocm17930402 
040 |a TXA  |b eng  |c TXA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCG  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d TXA 
043 |a n-us-tx 
049 |a TXAM 
099 |a 1986  |a Dissertation  |a T564 
100 1 |a Tietje, William Dean. 
245 1 0 |a Aspects of the wintering ecology of northern shovelers on freshwater and saline habitats. 
264 1 |c 1986. 
300 |a xiii, 94 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 29 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Typescript (photocopy). 
500 |a Vita. 
502 |b Ph. D. in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences  |c Texas A & M University  |d 1986 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 70-75). 
520 3 |a Habitat factors, feeding ecology, and physiological body condition of northern shovelers (Anas clypeata) were studied on saline wetlands of the Texas Gulf Coast, and on several freshwater lakes 18 km inland. The hypothesis considered was that freshwater and saltwater habitats do not provide equal resources for wintering shovelers and that this difference would be reflected in body condition. Aquatic vegetation persisted through winter 1982-84 in freshwater wetlands, but died out of most saltwater ponds by late December both years. Plankton biomass averaged 4x greater in freshwater than saltwater habitat during winter 1982-83, but little difference occurred the next year. Nekton and seed biomass averaged 33% and 4x greater, respectively, in freshwater habitat during 1982-84. Shovelers fed about equal time on freshwater and saltwater habitats. Plankton comprised about 33% of the diet in both habitats, but shovelers that inhabited freshwater consumed proportionately more plant foods than their saltwater counterparts, which presumably substituted a low-quality diet of Foraminifera. Gut morphology data indicated clearly that diet quality was better among shovelers that foraged on freshwater wetlands. However, the caloric density of the diet was about equal on freshwater and saltwater habitats in 1982-83 and greater on saltwater the next winter, due largely to consumption of cold-stunned fish during a 2-week period in December 1983. Plankton was the most preferred shoveler food on both wetland types. Average body and omental-fat weights of shovelers of all age-sex classes were larger at freshwater than saltwater sites in 29 of 40 between-habitat comparisons; a notable exception to that trend occurred during the record cold weather of 1983-84. Average body, omental-fat, and sternal-muscle weights were larger at saltwater sites, apparently due to consumption of fish. In contrast, during the unusually cold weather, condition declined in freshwater habitat, presumably because of the lack of fish and reduced availability of plankton and nekton. These data indicate that condition was influenced by food availability, and that saltwater habitat was generally inferior to freshwater habitat for wintering shovelers during the study. 
650 0 |a Anas clypeata  |x Feeding and feeds. 
650 0 |a Anas clypeata  |x Habitat. 
650 0 |a Ducks  |x Wintering  |z Texas  |z Coastal Bend Region. 
650 4 |a Major wildlife and fisheries sciences. 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Silvy, Nova J.,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Smeins, Fred E.,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Teer, James G.,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a Weller, Milton W.,  |e degree supervisor. 
710 2 |a Texas A & M University,  |e degree granting institution. 
856 4 1 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=753963521&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=2945&RQT=309&VName=PQD  |z Link to ProQuest copy  |t 0 
856 4 1 |u https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-21188  |z Link to OAKTrust copy  |t 0 
994 |a C0  |b TXA 
999 f f |s 3038e037-e0a7-3b2c-acba-bc4bbf225123  |i 08ef1c14-1701-35be-9bab-e28e4bee4162  |t 0 
952 f f |p noncirc  |a Texas A&M University  |b J.J. Pickle Campus  |c High Density Repository  |s HDR  |d Remote Storage  |t 0  |e 1986 Dissertation T564  |h Other scheme  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14839615504 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |s www_evans  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e 1986 Dissertation T564  |h Other scheme 
998 f f |a 1986 Dissertation T564  |t 0  |l Available Online 
998 f f |a 1986 Dissertation T564  |t 0  |l Remote Storage